Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Common Factors Across Theories of Marriage and Family Therapy a Modified Delphi Study

Abstract

Psychotherapy is generally effective for resolving a variety of presenting problems. Even so, the mechanisms of modify that contribute to this effectiveness are not generally well-understood. The purpose of this paper is to present refinements to an instrument developed to assess client perception of therapy productiveness. In other words, what things occur in therapy sessions that clients identify as giving rise to success in achieving their therapeutic goals. This paper presents the results of a confirmatory factor analysis to test and refine the factor structure of the Productive Processes Inventory. A sample of 286 individuals in individual, couple and family therapy completed the PPI and related measures. Results showed that a modified 3 factor construction presented the best fit to these data. Implications for research and clinical practice are presented and discussed.

References

  • Ahn, H., & Wampold, B. Due east. (2001). Where oh where are the specific ingredients? A meta-analysis of component studies in counseling and psychotherapy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48(3), 251–257. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.48.iii.251.

    Article  Google Scholar

  • Allgood, Southward. M., & Crane, D. R. (1991). Predicting marital therapy dropouts. Periodical of Marital and Family Therapy, 17, 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1991.tb00866.x.

    Article  Google Scholar

  • Asay, T. P., & Lambert, Grand. J. (1999). The empirical case for the mutual factors in therapy: Quantitative findings. In Yard. A. Hubble, B. 50. Duncan, & S. D. Miller (Eds.), The heart and soul of change: What works in therapy (pp. 23–55). Washington, DC: American Psychological Clan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar

  • Beutler, Fifty. E., & Harwood, T. M. (2002). What is and tin can exist attributed to the therapeutic human relationship? Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 32, 25–33. https://doi.org/x.1023/a:1015579111666.

    Article  Google Scholar

  • Bischoff, R. J., & Sprenkle, D. H. (1993). Dropping out of matrimony and family therapy: A critical review of research. Family Process, 32, 353–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1993.00353.10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  • Accident, A., Morrison, North., Tamaren, K., Wright, 1000., Schaafsma, M., & Nadaud, A. (2009). Alter processes in couple therapy: An intensive case analysis of ane couple using a common factors lens. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 35, 350–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2009.00122.10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  • Blow, A. J., & Sprenkle, D. H. (2001). Common factors across theories of marriage and family unit therapy: A modified Delphi study. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 27, 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2001.tb00333.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  • Blow, A. J., Sprenkle, D. H., & Davis, S. D. (2007). Is who delivers the handling more important than the handling itself? The role of the therapist in common factors. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33, 298–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2007.00029.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  • Bordin, E. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the brotherhood. Psychotherapy: Theory, Enquiry and Practice, xvi, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0085885.

    Commodity  Google Scholar

  • Bordin, E. S. (1994). Theory and research on the therapeutic working alliance: New directions. In A. O. Horvath & L. S. Greenberg (Eds.), The working alliance: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 13–37). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar

  • Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, South. D. (2011). Amazon'due south Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, even so loftier-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  • Christensen, L. Fifty., Russell, C. South., Miller, R. B., & Peterson, C. M. (1998). The process of change in couples therapy: A qualitative investigation. Periodical of Marital and Family Therapy, 24, 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1998.tb01074.x.

    Commodity  PubMed  Google Scholar

  • D'Aniello, C., Piercy, F. P., Dolbin-MacNab, M., & Perkins, S. (2018). How clients of union and family therapists make decisions about therapy discontinuation and persistence. Gimmicky Family Therapy, 41(one), 1–11. https://doi.org/ten.1007/s10591-018-9469-7.

    Article  Google Scholar

  • D'Aniello, C., & Tambling, R. B. (2017). Instrument design and principle components factor assay of the productive processes inventory. The Family Periodical, 25, 76–83. https://doi.org/x.1177/1066480716680175.

    Article  Google Scholar

  • Davis, South. D., Lebow, J. 50., & Sprenkle, D. H. (2012). Common factors of change in couple therapy. Behavior Therapy, 43, 36–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12033.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  • Davis, S. D., & Piercy, F. P. (2007a). What clients of couple therapy model developers and their sometime students say nearly change, office I: Model-dependent common factors beyond 3 models. Periodical of Marital and Family Therapy, 33, 318–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2007.00030.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  • Davis, S. D., & Piercy, F. P. (2007b). What clients of MFT model developers and their onetime students say virtually change, Part II: Model independent common factors and an integrative framework. Periodical of Marital and Family Therapy, 33, 344–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2007.00030.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  • Dillman, D. A. (2007). Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method. New York, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar

  • Greenberg, Fifty., & Pinsof, Due west. (1986). Procedure inquiry electric current trends and future prospects. In L. South. Greenberg & W. Pinsof (Eds.), The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook (pp. three–xx). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar

  • Greenberg, L. S., James, P. Southward., & Conry, R. F. (1988). Perceived change processes in emotionally focused couples therapy. Journal of Family Psychology, two, 5–23. https://doi.org/x.1037/0893-3200.ii.1.5.

    Commodity  Google Scholar

  • Hatcher, R. Fifty., & Gillaspy, J. A. (2006). Development and validation of a revised short version of the Working Alliance Inventory. Psychotherapy Enquiry, 16, 12–25. https://doi.org/x.1080/10503300500352500.

    Article  Google Scholar

  • Heatherington, L., Friedlander, M. L., & Greenberg, L. (2005). Alter process enquiry in couple and family unit therapy: Methodological challenges and opportunities. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.19.ane.18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  • Helmeke, Thou. B., & Sprenkle, D. H. (2000). Clients' perceptions of pivotal moments in couples therapy: A qualitative written report of modify in therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 26, 469–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2000.tb00317.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  • Horvath, A. O. (1994). Empirical validation of Bordin'south pan theoretical model of the brotherhood: The working alliance inventory perspective. In A. O. Horvath & L. S. Greenberg (Eds.), The working alliance: Theory, research and practice (pp. 109–130). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar

  • Horvath, A. O. (2001). The alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Enquiry, Practise, Training, 38, 365–372. https://doi.org/10.1108/1525383x201000001.

    Article  Google Scholar

  • Horvath, A. O. (2006). The alliance in context: Accomplishments, challenges, and future directions. Psychotherapy: Theory, Practice, Training, 43, 258–263. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-3204.43.3.258.

    Commodity  Google Scholar

  • Horvath, A. O., & Greenberg, L. (1989). Development and validation of the working brotherhood inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36, 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.45.1.30.

    Commodity  Google Scholar

  • Horvath, A. O., & Greenberg, L. Southward. (Eds.). (1994). The working brotherhood: Theory, research, and exercise. Wiley series on personality processes. Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar

  • Horvath, A. O., & Symonds, B. D. (1991). Relation between working brotherhood and outcome in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.38.2.139.

    Article  Google Scholar

  • Howard, Thou. I., Kopta, S. Grand., Krause, M. S., & Orlinsky, D. E. (1986). The dose-issue relationship in psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 41, 159–164. https://doi.org/x.1037/a0033589.

    Commodity  PubMed  Google Scholar

  • Hu, L., & Benter, P. Thousand. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to nether parameterized model specification. Psychological Methods, three, 424–453. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.three.four.424.

    Article  Google Scholar

  • Hubble, 1000. A., Duncan, B. L., & Miller, S. D. (Eds.). (1999). The heart and soul of change: What works in therapy (pp. 33–56). Washington, DC: American Psychological Clan.

    Google Scholar

  • Johnson, Fifty. D., Miller, Southward. D., & Duncan, B. L. (2000). The Session Rating Scale iii.0. Chicago, IL: Authors.

  • Johnson, 50. North., Wright, D. W., & Ketring, S. A. (2002). The therapeutic alliance in domicile-based family therapy: Is information technology predictive of consequence? Periodical of Marital and Family Therapy, 28, 93–102.

    Commodity  PubMed  Google Scholar

  • Knerr, M., Bartle-Haring, S., McDowell, T., Adkins, K., Delaney, R. O., Gangamma, R., et al. (2011). The impact of initial factors on therapeutic alliance in individual and couples therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 37(2), 182–199. https://doi.org/ten.1111/j.1752-0606.2009.00176.ten.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  • Lambert, M. J. (1992). Implications of consequence research for psychotherapy integration. In J. C. Norcross & 1000. R. Goldfried (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy integration (pp. 94–129). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar

  • Lambert, M. J., & Ogles, B. G. (2004). The efficacy and effectiveness of psychotherapy. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and beliefs change (5th ed., pp. 139–193). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar

  • Leeper, T. J. (2017). MTurkR: Access to Amazon Mechanical Turk Requester API via R. R package version 0.8.0.

  • Miller, S. D., Duncan, B. L., & Hubble, M. A. (1997). Escape from Babel: Toward a unifying language for psychotherapy do. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (second ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar

  • Oka, Thousand., & Whiting, J. (2013). Bridging the clinician/researcher gap with systemic inquiry: The case for process research, dyadic and sequential analysis. Journal of Marital and Family unit Therapy, 39, 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2012.00339.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  • Orlinsky, D. E., & Howard, K. I. (1978). The relation of procedure to outcome in psychotherapy. In Southward. L. Garfield & A. E. Bergin (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and beliefs change (2d ed., pp. 283–330). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar

  • Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (1991). Measurement, blueprint and analysis: An integrated arroyo. New Bailiwick of jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar

  • Pinsof, West. Yard., & Wynne, Fifty. C. (2000). Toward progress research: Closing the gap between family unit therapy do and inquiry. Journal of Marital and Family unit Therapy, 26, ane–8. https://doi.org/ten.1111/j.1752-0606.2000.tb00270.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  • Shadish, W. R., & Baldwin, A. S. (2003). Meta-analysis of MFT interventions. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 29, 547–570. https://doi.org/x.1111/j.1752-0606.2003.tb01694.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  • Shadish, Westward. R., Ragsdale, One thousand., Glaser, R. R., & Montgomery, L. M. (1995). The efficacy and effectiveness of marital and family therapy: A perspective from meta-analysis. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 21, 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1995.tb00170.x.

    Article  Google Scholar

  • Smith, G. L., & Glass, G. V. (1977). Meta-analysis of psychotherapy effect studies. American Psychologist, 32, 752–760. https://doi.org/x.1037/0003-066x.32.9.752.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Primal  Google Scholar

  • Sprenkle, D. H. (2012). Intervention research in couple and family therapy: A methodological and substantive review and an introduction to the special issue. Periodical of Marital and Family Therapy, 38, 3–nineteen. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00271.x.

    Commodity  PubMed  Google Scholar

  • Sprenkle, D. H., & Blow, A. J. (2004a). Mutual factors and our sacred models. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 30, 113–129. https://doi.org/ten.1111/j.1752-0606.2004.tb01228.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  • Sprenkle, D. H., & Accident, A. J. (2004b). Mutual factors are not islands—they work through models: A response to Sexton, Ridley, and Kleiner. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, xxx(2), 151–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2004.tb01230.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  • Sprenkle, D. H., Blow, A. J., & Dickey, M. H. (1999). Common factors and other non-technique variables in MFT. In One thousand. A. Hubble, B. Fifty. Duncan, & S. D. Miller (Eds.), The eye and soul of modify: What works in therapy (pp. 329–360). Washington, DC: American Psychological Clan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar

  • Sprenkle, D. H., Davis, S. D., & Lebow, J. 50. (2009). Common factors in couple and family therapy: The overlooked foundation for constructive practise. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar

  • Ward, D. B., & McCollum, E. East. (2005). Treatment effectiveness and its correlates in a marriage and family therapy training clinic. American Journal of Family Therapy, 33, 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926180590932960.

    Commodity  Google Scholar

  • Wark, L. (1994). Therapeutic change in couples' therapy: Critical change incidents perceived past therapists and clients. Contemporary Family Therapy, sixteen, 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02197601.

    Article  Google Scholar

  • Werner-Wilson, R. J., & Wintertime, A. (2010). What factors influence therapy dropout? Gimmicky Family Therapy, 32, 375–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-010-9131-5.

    Article  Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Respective author

Correspondence to Carissa D'Aniello.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We have no potential conflicts of interest.

IRB Approval

Enquiry involving human participants was conducted only later on receiving IRB approval and complying with IRB standards.

Ethical Approval

All human participants signed an informed consent certificate and had the ability to discontinue participation at whatsoever time during the study.

Additional data

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

D'Aniello, C., Tambling, R. A Confirmatory Factor Assay of the Productive Processes Inventory. Contemp Fam Ther 41, 275–284 (2019). https://doi.org/x.1007/s10591-019-09495-ix

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Result Engagement:

  • DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-019-09495-nine

Keywords

  • Productiveness
  • Therapy retentivity
  • Confirmatory factor analysis

watchmancomplefro.blogspot.com

Source: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10591-019-09495-9?error=cookies_not_supported&code=519caf9a-373e-4160-a3bd-8232b7afde63

Post a Comment for "Common Factors Across Theories of Marriage and Family Therapy a Modified Delphi Study"